Drawing for MSA

USPTO serial 76083545

MSA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MSA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory P. LaPointe

GREGORY P LAPOINTE BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, PC900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric machines for welding of plastic materials, especially pipes, tube or pipe joints and other piping sections, like fittings, sleeves, T-junctionsABANDONED—
009Computer software for welding processes for plastic materialsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2002ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance