USPTO serial 76083647
ITERMINAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ITERMINAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lucy B. Arant
LUCY B ARANT RUSS, AUGUST KABAT & KENT12424 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER MONITORS, LCD FLAT SCREEN MONITORS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, MOUSES, KEYBOARDS, MULTIMEDIA SPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, CAMERAS, MODEMS, POWER SUPPLIES, SCANNERS, FLOPPY DISK DRIVERS, HARD DISK DRIVERS, CD-ROMS DVD ROMS, JOY STICKS, NETWORK HUBS, NETWORK REPEATERS, TOUCH SCREENS, CPU FANS MONITORS AND PRINTERS; COMPUTER INTERFACE CARDS, NAMELY, VIDEO GRAPHIC ADAPTER CARDS, VIDEO CAPTURE CARDS, SOUND CARDS, I/O CARDS, SCSI CARDS, NETWORK LAN CARDS, MODEM CARDS AND MEMORY CARDS; COMPUTERS, NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS VIDEO CASSETTE PLAYERS, DVD PLAYERS, VIDEO GAME MACHINES, TELEPHONES, PORTABLE PHONES AND PAGERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |