USPTO serial 76083805
CLUB MED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLUB MED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75019 Paris, FR
75019 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Games and playthings, namely, arcade games, video games, video game cartridges and discs, computer game programs, computer game software, computer game cartridges and discs, and joysticks, steering mechanisms and interactive control units for use with computer games, video games and arcade games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, board games, action skill games, card games, arcade games, dolls, puzzles, namely, manipulative puzzles, jigsaw puzzles and cube-type puzzles, flying disks, kites, balloons, bingo cards, darts and dart boards, jump ropes, floatation devices for recreational use, namely, arm floats for recreational use, swim floats for recreational use, kickboards for recreational use, pool rafts, and inner tubes for recreational use, water squirting toys, gymnastic and sporting articles, namely, training stools, parallel bars, trampolines, weight lifting belts, body boards and parts and cases therefor, water skis and parts and cases therefor, sail boards and surf boards and parts and cases therefor, fishing bait, namely, artificial fishing bait and packaged freeze-dried fishing bait, swimming goggles, scuba diving goggles, snorkels, scuba flippers, exercise machines, skis and ski poles and parts and cases therefor, ski wax, snow boards, snow shoes, billiard equipment, namely, cues, chalk, bridges, and triangles, golf equipment, namely, golf clubs, golf club covers, golf club hand grips, golf club shafts, grip tape for golf clubs, golf gloves, golf club inserts, golf club heads, golf club head covers, golf bags, golf bag covers, golf tees, golf ball markers, golf ball retrievers, and non-motorized golf carts, ice skates, skateboards, in-line skates, roller skates, baseballs, basketballs, billiard balls, bowling balls, cricket balls, field hockey balls, footballs, golf balls, hand balls, lacrosse balls, playground balls, paddle balls, racket balls, rubber action balls, soccer balls, squash balls, squeezable stress balls, tennis balls, volleyballs, hockey pucks, tennis rackets, baseball mitts, baseball bats, hockey sticks, badminton game playing equipment, basketball nets and goals, soccer nets and goals, lacrosse nets and goals, field hockey nets and goals, volleyball nets and tennis nets; toys, namely, stuffed toys, wind up toys, bath toys, mechanical action toys, yo-yos, and model vehicles and accessories therefor; decorations for Christmas trees | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |