USPTO serial 76084231
CROCODILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2880594Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2004
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CROCODILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CROCODILE TECHNOLOGY (UK) LIMITED
LONDON, GB
North Fremantle, Western Australia, AU
NORTH FREEMANTLE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA, AU
NORTH FREEMANTLE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA, AU
NORTH FREEMANTLE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph H. Dougherty
RALPH H DOUGHERTY DOUGHERTY, CLEMENTS & HOFERSTE 3001901 ROXBOROUGH RDCHARLOTTE, NC 28211Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Tires; non-pneumatic tires; composite tire comprising assemblies of tire segments; tire segments for composite tires; tire clips for releasably securing tires onto wheel rims; wheel rims for vehicles; and endless tracks for tracked vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CROCODILE TECHNOLOGY (UK) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BURNS, ALAN ROBERT
- Other trademarks owned by CROCODILE TYRES LTD
- Other trademarks owned by CROCODILE TYRES LTD
- Other trademarks owned by CROCODILE TYRES LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named CROCODILE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |