Drawing for BUZZTEENS

USPTO serial 76084551

BUZZTEENS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUZZTEENS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa M. Martens

LISA M MARTENS FISH & RICHARDSON PC12390 EL CAMINO REALSAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services, namely, providing interactive games via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 19, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 14, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 1, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 5, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance