USPTO serial 76084679
HYBRIDYNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYBRIDYNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRISTRAM R FALL III
TRISTRAM R FALL III FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP2000 MARKET ST FL 10PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical imaging devices, namely, diagnostic and treatment medical imaging devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hybridyne Imaging Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hybridyne Imaging Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named HYBRIDYNE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |