USPTO serial 76084886
ZINO PLATINUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZINO PLATINUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1200 Geneva, CH
1200 Geneva, CH
1700 FRIBOURG, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | suitcases, purses, wallets, credit card holders, all of the forgoing goods made of leather or imitation leather; trunks and traveling bags; umbrellas, walking sticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, suits, jackets, shirts, blouses, pants, skirts, underwear, socks, ties, gloves; footwear and hats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Davidoff & Cie SA
- Other trademarks owned by Davidoff & Cie SA
- Other trademarks owned by ZINO DAVIDOFF SA
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ZINO PLATINUM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |