Drawing for REFERRALPOWER

USPTO serial 76085324

REFERRALPOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REFERRALPOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dermot Horgan or Jeannine Haas

DERMOT HORGAN OR JEANNINE HAAS SUITW #240IPHORGAN LTD1130 LAKE COOK RDBUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employment agency services, namely employment referral, job search and career counseling servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance