Drawing for SHARI'S BERRIES

USPTO serial 76085498

SHARI'S BERRIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHARI'S BERRIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELLE R. HARBOTTLE

ALLYN TAYLOR GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP2000 UNIVERSITY AVENUE`EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2248UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030chocolate-dipped strawberriesACTIVENov 2, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 15, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance