USPTO serial 76085512
THE TRENDSOURCE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2769591Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2003
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE TRENDSOURCE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne B. Bochinski
Julianne B. Bochinski Law Office of Julianne B. BochinskiPO Box 2723Westport, CT 06880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Personnel placement and recruitment services, whereby individuals are selected, engaged, and deployed as shoppers over a global computer network for the purpose of evaluating customer service quality | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MOLL CONSULTING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRENDSOURCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Mystery Shoppers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mystery Shoppers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mystery Shoppers, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE TRENDSOURCE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |