USPTO serial 76085700
ONE WORLD, ONE NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONE WORLD, ONE NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
V6C 3E8 Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin S. Costanza
KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYLAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing information to others pertaining to a wide variety of subjects via a computer network or global communication network; acquiring, organizing and providing streaming media to others; aggregating, organizing, promoting and distributing information available on the global computer network to users of a computer network or global communication network; advertising for others via a global computer or communication network; organizing and providing links to a wide variety of sites on the global communication network; facilitating access to and purchases of goods and services via a computer or global communication network, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |