Drawing for TIC TAC POKER

USPTO serial 76085750

TIC TAC POKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIC TAC POKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY A. PINE

JEFFREY A PINE BANIAK PINE & GANNON150 N WACKER DR STE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60606-1606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment, namely a continuing game show distributed over television, satellite, Internet and radio showsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 22, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance