Drawing for SEEBUSINESS

USPTO serial 76086485

SEEBUSINESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEEBUSINESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric T. Fingerhut

ERIC T FINGERHUT SHAW PITTMAN2300 N ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR RETRIEVING, ANALYZING AND REPORTING BUSINESS INFORMATION AND DATA STORED ON ELECTRONIC DATABASES, IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS INTELLIGENCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 4, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 5, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance