USPTO serial 76086566
MICROFET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROFET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Lawton Rogers, III
MARK C COMTOIS DUANE MORRIS LLP1667 K ST N W STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SEMICONDUCTORS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, TRANSISTORS AND VERY LOW PROFILE SURFACE MOUNT TRANSISTOR PACKAGES FOR HAND-HELD AND PORTABLE INFORMATION DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 23, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |