Drawing for COLLABORATIVE POWER

USPTO serial 76086594

COLLABORATIVE POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLLABORATIVE POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY

MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY GREENBERG GLUSKER FEILDS CLAMAN ET AL1900 AVE OF THE STARS STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4590UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software; namely, computer software to support electronic interactions and transactions for others by creating tasks and following their accomplishment by employees of an organization via Intranets, Extranets and a global computer network for use in the field of business management and office functions; computer software for creating tasks, tracking progress, following decisions, missions and tasks for use in the field of business manage and office and office functions; computer software for providing organizational solutions by creating tasks and following their accomplishment by employees of an organization for use in the field of business management and office functions; computer software for providing electronic agendas by creating tasks ad following their accomplishment by employees of an organization for use in the field of business management and office functions all via electronic mail; computer software for generating and navigating reports reminders and search result for use in the field of business management and office functions; computer software that enable access to a global computer network for use in the field of business management and office functions; computer software for providing electronic mail solutions and for automatic sending of e-mails for use in the field of business management and office functionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance