USPTO serial 76086929
APPTRICITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2828811Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2004
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with APPTRICITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irving, TX
IRVING, TX
IRVING, TX
IRVING, TX
IRVING, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randy K. Sterns
RANDY K STERNS BUSH ROSS GARDNER WARREN & RUDY, PA220 S FRANKLIN STTAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING MARKETING SOLUTIONS WHICH UTILIZES WIRELESS SYNCHRONIZATION OF DATA FOR INSTANT POSTING AND PROCESSING OF DATA FOR EBUSINESS APPLICATIONS THEREBY ENABLING USERS TO ACCESS BUSINESS DATA FROM THE WORLD WIDE WEB AND WIRELESS DEVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2000 |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR UTILIZING WIRELESS SYNCHRONIZATION OF DATA FOR INSTANT POSTING AND PROCESSING OF DATA FOR EBUSINESS APPLICATIONS THEREBY ENABLING USERS TO ACCESS BUSINESS DATA FROM THE WORLD WIDE WEB WIRELESS DEVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Apptricity, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by APPTRICITY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by APPTRICITY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by APPTRICITY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by APPTRICITY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named APPTRICITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |