USPTO serial 76087081
POINTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POINTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sonderborg, DB-6400, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Vapnek, Esq.
PAUL W VAPNEK ESQ TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cellular and wireless telephones, personal data assistants, and wireless connection devices which allows access and connectivity to traffic, travel, education, tourism and leisure related information and data services to mobile users via a long and short range wireless communications system; cellular and wireless telephones, personal data assistants, and wireless connection devices which allow access to historic,geographic, political and related information concerning the place at which the devices are used; radio telephones, transmitters, pagers, wireless connection devices, and personal data assistants | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Providing information in the field of traffic and travel via the global computer network and mobile users via long and short range wireless links | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing information in the field of education via the global computer network and mobile users via long and short range links | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |