USPTO serial 76087379
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London EC2Y 8DH, GB
London EC2Y 8DH, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY E CARROLL
AMY E CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for measuring operational performance of and financial returns from investment in information technology and intellectual property, namely, patents, design patents, copyright and trade marks, in the field of large corporate and professional management; blank magnetic data carriers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultation services; business information, namely information concerning operational performance of and financial returns from investment in information technology and intellectual property, namely, patents, design patents, copyright and trade marks, for large corporate and professional management; business management; business management consultation services; commercial information agencies; business appraisal services; business research; cost/price analysis services; market research | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Publication of books, texts, namely, magazines, journals, newsletters and interactive electronic based teaching and learning texts; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on CD-ROM's featuring reports on performance and financial returns from investment in information technology and intellectual property, namely, patents, design patents, copyright and trade marks; educational services, namely conducting courses of instruction and training in the field of information technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming and computer software design for others; computer consultation in the field of information technology, information technology system research and development, electronic commerce and web-sites; designing web-sites for others; database development services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |