Drawing for ITVA

USPTO serial 76087379

ITVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ITVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY E CARROLL

AMY E CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer software for measuring operational performance of and financial returns from investment in information technology and intellectual property, namely, patents, design patents, copyright and trade marks, in the field of large corporate and professional management; blank magnetic data carriersACTIVE—
035Business consultation services; business information, namely information concerning operational performance of and financial returns from investment in information technology and intellectual property, namely, patents, design patents, copyright and trade marks, for large corporate and professional management; business management; business management consultation services; commercial information agencies; business appraisal services; business research; cost/price analysis services; market researchACTIVE—
041Publication of books, texts, namely, magazines, journals, newsletters and interactive electronic based teaching and learning texts; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on CD-ROM's featuring reports on performance and financial returns from investment in information technology and intellectual property, namely, patents, design patents, copyright and trade marks; educational services, namely conducting courses of instruction and training in the field of information technologyACTIVE—
042Computer programming and computer software design for others; computer consultation in the field of information technology, information technology system research and development, electronic commerce and web-sites; designing web-sites for others; database development servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance