Drawing for DISA

USPTO serial 76087878

DISA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Ducts of metal for ventilating and air conditioning installations and structural parts and fitting thereforACTIVE—
009computer software, electronic power boards and electronic monitor boards for controlling extraction, ventilation and filter systemsACTIVE—
011air filters and ventilating fans for air conditioning and structural parts and fittings thereforACTIVE—
019Ducts, not of metal, for ventilating and air conditioning installations and structural parts and fittings thereforACTIVE—
037Maintenance, installation and repair of extraction and ventilation systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 16, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 200144DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance