USPTO serial 76087963
NO-TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO-TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamilton, OH
Hamilton, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Pritchard
DAVID E PRITCHARD WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2917Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Janitorial carts for holding and transporting commercial and industrial custodial supplies | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |