Drawing for ADVANTAGE PLUS

USPTO serial 76088062

ADVANTAGE PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANTAGE PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARTHUR H. SEIDEL

ARTHUR H SEIDEL DRINKER, BIDDLE, & REATH LLP18TH AND CHERRY STSPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ceiling fansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 25, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 1, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 24, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance