Drawing for SENTIENT

USPTO serial 76088657

SENTIENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENTIENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marsha K. Hoover

MARSHA K HOOVER DAVIS, MANNIX & MCGRATH125 S WACKER, STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance services, namely writing and underwriting of casualty insurance, property insurance, liability insurance, and life insurance and providing ancillary services thereto, namely administration, claims adjustment and brokerageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 4, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 19, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance