Drawing for FUZZBALLS

USPTO serial 76088994

FUZZBALLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUZZBALLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID A. MANCINO

DAVID A MANCINO TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP425 WALNUT ST STE 1800CINCINNATI, OH 45202-3957UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Stationery; address books; books containing compilations of comic strips; coloring books; printed invitations; memo pads; paper napkins; pens and pencils; pencil boxes and cases; playing cards; photograph albums; wrapping paper for gifts; writing paper and envelopes; writing tablets; postcards; three-ring binders; book covers; bookends; bookmarks; printed instructional material on various subjects in elementary and secondary education; crayons; felt tip markers; erasers; paper lunch bags; calendars; appointment calendars; diaries; drawing paper; framed collectible comic strips; bank checks and checkbook covers; bumper stickers; business cards; credit cards; desk pads; desktop organizers; non-magnetically encoded telephone cards; syndicated newspaper columns dealing with comic strip charactersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 23, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 9, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance