USPTO serial 76090086
BANON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BANON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VILLANUEVA DEL ARZOBISOP, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J McNamara
BRIAN J MCNAMARA WASHINGTON HARBOURFOLEY & LARDNERWASHINGTON, DC 20075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit, namely, preserved, dried, cooked and stewed fruit; fruit jellies; fruit salads; marmalade; vegetables namely, preserved, dried and cooked vegetables; vegetables salads; processed olives; eggs; milk; milk products; namely chocolate milk; cream; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; meat; game; meat extracts; fish; poultry; edible fats; edible oils; olive oil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |