USPTO serial 76090371
DIFFEROMETRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIFFEROMETRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori N. Boatright
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR, & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1026UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Electronic imaging and scanning of three-dimensional representations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Namebrella, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Namebrella, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by NEXTENGINE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named DIFFEROMETRY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |