USPTO serial 76090538
HITACHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HITACHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8010, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8010, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle C. Burke
MICHELLE C BURKE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Material treatment services, namely, crease-resistant treatment, drying, dyeing, fireproofing, permanent press treatment, bleaching, pre-shrinking, waterproofing, crease-resistance treating and moth proofing, of cloth, clothing, fur and leather; tailoring; dressmaking; embroidery; electroplating; mill working; metal and glass annealing; metal tempering; galvanizing; processing, developing, enlarging and printing of photographic and cinematographic films; bookbinding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |