Drawing for HOTLINE CONNECT

USPTO serial 76090577

HOTLINE CONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOTLINE CONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert I. Cantor

HERBERT I CANTOR CROWELL & MORING LLPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for transmitting, receiving, storing and/or tracking electronic mail, text, graphics, audio, video, audio visual, voice and/or other data in a digital form of expression from a remote computer network and for accessing global communications networks, collaborative global communications network and intranet computer software permitting multiple host servers and remote users to access, share, transfer and/or modify common electronic documents or contents of computer memory, the contents of which include forms of expression, namely electronic mail, text, graphics, audio video, audio visual, voice and/or other data in a digital form of expression; computer software for business, educational, recreational and research purposes which permits the real time exchange of electronic information and data, including electronic information and data depicted in graphic, text and/or audio-visual form between one computer and other computers either within one organization or entity or worldwide through global computer networks; commercial software to be used as a communications tool designed to facilitate the real time exchange of a wide range of information between customers and customer representatives over the global communications network and the world wide web incorporating but not limited to the functions of text chat, and the ability to transfer web pages, brochures and filesACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely online real time transmission of a wide range of data and documents over the World Wide Web, incorporating but not limited to text communicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 29, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance