USPTO serial 76090625
DIFFEROMETRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIFFEROMETRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA MONICA, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Coester
THOMAS M COESTER BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer communications hardware and computer software for use in scanning three-dimensional information, representations and images; three dimensional scanners; computer software for use in operating three dimensional scanners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEXTENGINE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Namebrella, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Namebrella, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIFFEROMETRY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |