USPTO serial 76090634
FORESTFACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SATCHI, SUDARSHINI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FORESTFACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Celine Jimenez Crowson, Esquire
CELINE JIMENEZ CROWSON ESQ HOGAN & HARTSON555 13TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING ELECTRONIC COMMERCE BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS IN THE FIELD OF PAPER PROCUREMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND ELECTRONIC BUSINESS SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PRODUCT INFORMATION; ORDER PLACEMENT, PROCESSING AND TRACKING; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT PROCESSING; INVOICING; INVENTORY AND CONSUMPTION MANAGEMENT; CLAIMS PROCESSING AND MANAGEMENT; CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING; AND PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF PAPER PROCUREMENT BY MEANS OF LINKING POTENTIAL BUYERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES WITH SELLERS OFFERING SUCH GOODS AND SERVICES FOR SALE, VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |