USPTO serial 76090830
PLANT IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLANT IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dara F. McLeod
DARA F MCLEOD GARDNER, CARTON & DOUGLAS,321 N CLARK STSTE 3400CHICAGO, IL 60610Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment, in particular for operating automation processing software; computers and machine run data carriers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services; services of an information scientist, namely consulting, creating and instructing in the development and operation of software for automation processes; technical consultancy with regard to automation processes and the manufacture of industrial steerings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |