USPTO serial 76090950
ECOMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2541697Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2002
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy Wright and John Brannon
SARAH M. JABBARI SOMMER BARNARD, P.C.ONE INDIANA SQUARESUITE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Abrasive preparation, comprised of powdered and ground glass, for cleaning hard surfaces | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 6, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Earthstone International LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Earthstone International LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Earthstone International LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ECOMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 28, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |