Drawing for TREKSYS.COM

USPTO serial 76091126

TREKSYS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TREKSYS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam Claire Beezy

MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY GREENBURG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN1900 AVE OF THE STARSLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online trading services to facilitate the sale of goods by others in which sellers post items to be auctioned and buyers bid on such items electronically; distributorship services featuring products used in the medical and healthcare industries; internet advertising services, namely, soliciting banner advertisements for placement on internet web pages and arranging for the display of such advertisements; providing business information regarding characteristics and quantity of traffic viewing banner advertisements on the internet; online advertising targeting networks, content, language, technology and geographic locationABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 21, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 21, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 1, 2002OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 12, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 10, 2002OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance