USPTO serial 76091348
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Farmington Hills, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Keller
PAUL A KELLER HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | multimedia sign systems composed of luminous, non-metal projection screens, image and sound projectors, videotapes and other media containing image and sounds, and parts and accessories therefore | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 2000 |
| 020 | point of purchase displays and parts and accessories therefore | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 2000 |
| 035 | preparing advertisements for others | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 2000 |
| 041 | motion picture and multimedia production services | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |