Drawing for VIDEOSCAPES

USPTO serial 76091348

VIDEOSCAPES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEOSCAPES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. Keller

PAUL A KELLER HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009multimedia sign systems composed of luminous, non-metal projection screens, image and sound projectors, videotapes and other media containing image and sounds, and parts and accessories thereforeACTIVEMar 25, 2000
020point of purchase displays and parts and accessories thereforeACTIVEMar 25, 2000
035preparing advertisements for othersACTIVEMar 25, 2000
041motion picture and multimedia production servicesACTIVEMar 25, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 20, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 21, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance