Drawing for INTERQUEST

USPTO serial 76091530

INTERQUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTERQUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy A. French

ROBERT E. PURCELL WALL MARJAMA & BILINSKI, LLP101 SOUTH SALINA STREET4TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 13202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software and hardware for computer communications testingABANDONEDFeb 21, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 26, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 26, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 20, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 23, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 14, 200444DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 9, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance