USPTO serial 76091730
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FIN-00180 Helsinki, FI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua Rawson
JOSHUA RAWSON CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & HAMILTONONE LIBERTY PLZNEW YORK, NY 10006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for providing mediation solutions for mobile, fixed, data, Internet or satellite telecommunications operators, namely, customer care mediation, billing mediation, subscriber administration, charging and payment solutions and solutions for managing, using and paying for usage of telecommunication services | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 1996 |
| 041 | Computer educational training services relating to the use of mediation software for mobile, fixed, data, Internet or satellite telecommunications operators, namely, conducting training programs for operating accounting mediation device software, subscriber administration system software for services activation and subscriber data management, added value service software for credit control and database software for others | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 1996 |
| 042 | Providing mediation software installation and maintenance services to mobile, fixed, data, Internet or satellite telecommunications operators | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |