Drawing for GOT2B

USPTO serial 76091910

GOT2B

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOT2B?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christel Emerson

CHRISTEL EMERSON HENKEL CORPORATION2200 RENAISSANCE BLVD THE TRIAD, STEGULPH MILLS, PA 19406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICS, NAMELY, PERFUMES, DENTIFRICES, TOILET WATERSACTIVEOct 25, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 17, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 24, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 24, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 28, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance