USPTO serial 76092090
PROFQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROFQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVE D. BEYER
STEVE D BEYER BEYER WEAVER & THOMAS, LLPP O BOX 778BERKELEY, CA 94704-0778UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software, namely, computer software for searching and retrieving information, sites and other resources on computer networks; computer hardware and software having voice recognition and speech synthesis capability; computer software and hardware for searching and retrieving information using natural language inquires; computer software for facilitating buying and selling products and services on computer networks; computer software for providing multi-user access to a computer network for buying and selling products and services; computer software for generating a searchable database of information from which information can be retrieved; computer software for generating a database regarding product information, customer information and preferences computer software for providing access to on line directions and web sites; and instruction manual sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, obtaining data and content information on a computer network using a search engine; searching and retrieving information, sites and other resources on a computer network using a search engine; searching and retrieving information on a computer network; creating for others indexes of information, web sites, and other resources available on a computer network; database development services in the field of customer assistance or demographics and in the field of on-line information access; and providing computer programming services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |