USPTO serial 76092524
EZIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2005
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EZIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jensen Beach, FL
Jensen Beach, FL
Jensen Beach, FL
JENSEN BEACH, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Redmond
6960 SW GATOR TRAILPALM CITY, FL 34990UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of diseases and disorders in the cardiovascular, cardiac, vascular and hematology fields | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 11, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |