Drawing for SMART

USPTO serial 76092562

SMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2772727Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 7, 2003
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANK TERRANELLA

FRANK TERRANELLA ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42D ST INEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010X-RAY APPARATUS FOR MEDICAL USE, NAMELY, DIGITAL DETECTORS FOR USE IN RADIOGRAPHYSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDNov 26, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2004C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 6, 2004AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Oct 7, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 7, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 21, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 23, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 1, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 29, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance