Drawing for MFT

USPTO serial 76092584

MFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen B. Salai

STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604-2070UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040waste treatment servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 27, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 27, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 21, 2003PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Jan 25, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 21, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 12, 2002PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 10, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance