Drawing for DRFIRST.COM

USPTO serial 76092736

DRFIRST.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COOK, BRADLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRFIRST.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark R. Leslie

MARK R LESLIE KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLPHENRY W OLIVER BLDG535 SMITHFIELD STPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2312

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing billing and office management services for medical practices and practitioners, namely, preparing reports and budgeting, via the Internet, telephone, fax, and mail; buying services, namely, providing discounts to member practitioners on selected goods and services purchased over the InternetACTIVE—
036Providing financial reporting services, namely, financial analysis and consultation for medical practices and practitionersACTIVE—
037Computer hardware installation and maintenanceACTIVE—
038Communication services, namely, providing a means for secure communications over a global communications and information network, providing secure electronic communications between medical service providers and insurance companies for medical insurance claims submission, management, and reporting, and for verification of insurance coverage eligibility of patientsACTIVE—
042Computer software installation and maintenance; design, hosting, and support of public and private Internet sites for medical practices and practitioners; providing electronic medical records over a global communications and information network, Leasing software including patient billing and accounting functions to medical practices and practitionersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance