USPTO serial 76092917
ARBITRON PPM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARBITRON PPM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle Levister
MICHELLE LEVISTER THE ARBITRON COMPANY9705 PATUXENT WOODS DRCOLUMBIA, MD 21046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices, namely, encoders installed at the distribution sources of television, radio, cable and satellite broadcasting that inserts inaudible signals into the audio stream, electronic devices that detect signals emitted from the encoders, and electronic docking stations that extract codes from the devices, all for the purpose of providing audience estimate and market research information and data to broadcasters, cablecasters, webcasters and other media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 16, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |