Drawing for INHOUSEIT

USPTO serial 76093106

INHOUSEIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INHOUSEIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric Karich

3151 AIRWAY AVE STE K-105COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer consultation services, namely, design of, hosting, and mirroring the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; up-dating of computer software; technical consulting and research in the field of high-speed information access via computer network; computer programming for others; designing and planning of Page computer systems and network infrastructure in the field of information technology for information technology users; remote monitoring of computer systems infrastructure, technical consultation in the field of computers for information technology and information technology users in the nature of providing information problem solving, advise, guidance, and configuration assistance, whether at the users' location or by telephone, via a global computer network, and by other electronic means; consulting on the selection and integration of business telephone systems and service, and in the selection of local and long distance telephone carriers; and monitoring of systems and networks for others, providing backup and disaster recovery facilities and services for others, hardware and software technical support, and network support and managementACTIVEAug 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance