USPTO serial 76093841
EVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE KAHN
FELIX MCKNIGHT NEXTSET SOFTWARE INC925 COMMERCIAL STPALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR MANAGING AND PROCESSING COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS VIA COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY LINKING BUYERS AND SELLERS FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND MANAGING AND PROCESSING COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS BY MEANS OF COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |