Drawing for THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE

USPTO serial 76094384

THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leah D Jackson

Leah D Jackson McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP303 Peachtree Street NESuite 5300Atlanta, GA 30308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in expense management and reporting; Computer software for use in expense management reporting; Computer software for use in automated design of expense management reports; Computer software for use in consolidating data in the field of business expense tracking; Computer software for use in conditioning data in the field of business expense tracking; Computer software to automate data warehousing; Computer software for use in information management, namely, the querying of remote databases through a distributed computer network, and transmission of data and reports in the field of business expense trackingACTIVE—
035Licensing of computer software; computerized database management; providing an interactive online computer database in the field of business expense managementACTIVE—
038Providing multiple user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of informationACTIVE—
042Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the storage and retrieval of data and information; Non-downloadable computer software for use in communicating data, records and reports via a distributed computer network, or via electronic mail or via the Internet or world wide webACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 28, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 4, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 6, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 28, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 19, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 1, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Jun 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 5, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 15, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance