Drawing for CARTER

USPTO serial 76094464

CARTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Bischoff

Christopher J. Bischoff Bischoff & Associates, Ltd.1650 Payne StreetEvanston, IL 60201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games, toys and playthings, namely, dolls, doll clothing, and accessories for dollsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 17, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 16, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 28, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 26, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 31, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 3, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 13, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance