USPTO serial 76094914
LIKEMINDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIKEMINDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Greg Doudnikoff
GREG DOUDNIKOFF DEPT. TL3B/B506, OFFICE E3094205 S MIAMI BLVDRESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 20079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN, CUSTOMIZATION, INTEGRATION, ANALYSIS AND CONSULTING SERVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE, INSTALLATION AND UPDATING SERVICES; COMPUTER NETWORK AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN, CUSTOMIZATION, INTEGRATION, ANALYSIS AND CONSULTING SERVICES; CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER CONSULTATION RELATING TO E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS; DESIGN, CUSTOMIZATION, IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NETWORK WEB PAGES AND WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK RELATING TO THE ABOVE-REFERENCED COMPUTER-RELATED SERVICES AND TOPICS; PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK REGARDING PERSONALIZATION SOFTWARE AND DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING CONSUMER INFORMATION AND PREFERENCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |