USPTO serial 76094924
ULTRADEV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 2002
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRADEV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel C. Poliak
DANIEL C POLIAK LEGAL DEPTADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED801 N 34TH STSEATTLE, WA 98103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS; WEB APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DEVELOPING WEB APPLICATIONS IN AN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS WHICH ALLOW USERS TO CONNECT WEB SITES TO DATABASES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AUTHORING TOOLS FOR CREATING WEB CONTENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DEVELOPING WEBSITES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DATABASE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 30, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |