USPTO serial 76095036
BBR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BBR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BIRMINGHAM, AL
Business Book Review.com, L.L.C.
Decatur, GA
Business Book Review.com, L.L.C.
Decatur, GA
Business Book Review.com, L.L.C.
Decatur, GA
IPSWICH, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Holland
Christopher A. Holland Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP1230 Peachtree StreetPromenade II, Suite 3100ATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazine in the field of business books | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EBSCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Business Book Review.com, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Business Book Review.com, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Business Book Review.com, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by EBSCO PUBLISHING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named BBR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |