Drawing for PICTURE THAT

USPTO serial 76095117

PICTURE THAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PICTURE THAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL H. JESTER

MICHAEL H JESTER505D GRAND CARIBE CAUSEWAYCORANDO, CA 92118-3303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016books with pictographs indexed by key words to enable travelers to communicate with persons that speak a different languageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance